Friday, November 21, 2014

Michael Jackson – “Blood on the Dance Floor: HIStory in the Mix” (1997)



Rating: 4
Best Song: “Blood on the Dance Floor”

            A rating of 4 indicates an album that I see as a failure, but I don’t actually feel that strongly about Blood on the Dance Floor. The reason is that, perhaps in following the similar misguided marketing strategy of its parent album, he this time pairs his new material (just five songs) with eight dance remixes of songs from HIStory. From an artistic perspective, I could probably get away with blasting the whole concept and just giving it a 1. Even the five new tracks include previously recorded material and outtakes, so it’s obvious that the whole project existed solely for the purpose of selling more albums and promoting Jackson’s lengthy “Ghosts” video.

            Fortunately, the project is salvaged by the fact that I do enjoy the five original tracks that start off the album. None of them would rank in the upper echelon of his oeuvre, but still range from solid to excellent. The title track is basically in the HIStory/Dangerous style, which is unsurprising given that it dates back to 1991, and compares well to “Dangerous” with muttered verse vocals erupting into a melodic chorus. “Morphine” drew some comparisons to Trent Reznor with its clanging metallic beat, but I feel that is overwrought – the main section of the song is really just a slightly more abrasive version of the dance songs from HIStory. What intrigues me about the song is the mid-section where it breaks down into “Heal the World”-esque strings and gentle piano, except that this time Michael is singing about abusing Demirol instead of saving starving children. It actually works for me in this context, perhaps because of the contrast with the harsher verses of the song, or because the lyrics make it eerie instead of sentimental.

            “Superfly Sister” is probably the most generic of the quintet, but still is a perfectly passable funk track. “Ghosts” again touches on the basic build-up of the title track, but it’s hard to fault the formula when he nails it so perfectly, again steamrolling out of downbeat verses and into the chorus with melodic gusto. Actually, on both this track and the subsequent “Is It Scary,” it’s actually the lead-in section to the choruses that I find most compelling and capture a vintage Michael Jackson, also known as my nostalgic sentiment. For this was indeed the last Michael Jackson album of my childhood. I still remember the delight I felt when I randomly discovered it in Wal-Mart one day, having had no idea that it was released.

            Unfortunately that sentiment does not extend to the eight dance remixes, which severely drag down the rating of the album, given that they make up a majority of the running time. This is one of those times where I find it unnecessary to delve into the differences between the remixes because I find the whole idea completely pointless. I’m sure it’s possible to make a creative remix but none of these strike me as interesting. Instead, the primary goal of the remixers employed here appear to have been to add a monotonous dance beat and ensure that the tempo never changes. My enjoyment somewhat wavers based primarily on how natural the instrumentation is – thus the Fugees’ remix of “2 Bad” is at least more engaging than the appalling remix of “Stranger in Moscow” where somebody somehow had the idea that adding a generic techno drum beat to an introspective ballad wouldn’t turn it into a terrible song. But I’m not sure it really matters, because with zero exceptions, I would prefer to just hear the original Michael Jackson version to any of the remixes.


            So I’m not really sure what the right rating is to give to an album like this one. I settled on 4 because listening to it straight through, my overall enjoyment level is negative, based solely on the fact that the remixes outnumber the original material. But in the digital era, it’s easy enough to stream or download the first five songs and ignore the rest, making it not totally worthless. It certainly is an album that could be enjoyed by a fan if nothing else, which is more than I can say for Invincible

No comments:

Post a Comment